In partnership with
You think 4x faster than you type. Your IDE should keep up.
Wispr Flow lets you dictate prompts, acceptance criteria, and bug reproductions inside Cursor or Warp — with automatic file name and variable recognition. Say user_id, get user_id. Say useEffect, get useEffect.
Paste directly into GitHub, Jira, or Linear. Give coding agents the full context they need without typing a novel.
89% of messages sent with zero edits. Millions of developers use Flow daily, including teams at OpenAI, Vercel, and Clay. Free on Mac, Windows, and iPhone.
iShares Silver Trust (SLV): Failed Zigzag Leaves Price Vulnerable Near Critical Support
SLV is approaching a decisive moment in its Elliott Wave structure, and the stakes are high. Much like gold, silver initially appeared to be completing a standard corrective pattern—but the recent price action is signaling that something may be breaking down beneath the surface. With price now hovering dangerously close to the 60 support level, the next move could determine whether SLV stabilizes or transitions into a much deeper corrective phase.
The Failed Zigzag Setup
The prior expectation for SLV was a classic ABC zigzag correction—a three-wave structure that typically resolves a pullback before the trend resumes. This would have involved:
A sharp initial decline (Wave A)
A recovery bounce (Wave B)
A final push lower (Wave C) to complete the correction
However, what makes the current setup concerning is that this zigzag appears to have failed. Instead of completing cleanly and reversing higher, the bounce lacked conviction, and price has rolled over again, drifting back toward key support.
A failed zigzag is not just a minor technical flaw—it often signals that the market is weaker than expected and may not be ready to resume its prior uptrend. In many cases, it leads to an extended correction or even a trend reversal.
The Importance of the 60 Level
The 60 support zone is now the critical level to watch.
This area represents more than just a horizontal support line—it’s a structural boundary that defines whether the current move remains corrective or evolves into something more bearish.
If SLV can hold above 60 and build a base, there is still a path for recovery. But the longer price lingers near this level without a meaningful bounce, the more fragile that support becomes.
A decisive break below 60 would likely confirm that the correction is not complete—and could trigger a much larger move to the downside.
It's Monday. Every department already has context. Nobody prepped anything.
Your CFO opens Slack. There's a weekly Stripe revenue recap in #finance with a churned-accounts flag and a net-new breakdown. She didn't ask for it.
Your head of product opens Slack. There's a GitHub summary in private channel: PRs merged, PRs stale, Linear tickets that moved. He didn't ask for it.
Your marketing lead opens Slack. There's a Google Ads performance comparison in private channel, with a note: "Meta CPA crept up 18% this week. Might be worth pausing the broad match campaign." She didn't ask for it either.
All-hands at 10am. Everyone already knows the numbers. The meeting is about decisions, not catch-up.
That's what happens when one colleague works across every tool your company uses. Not one department's assistant. The whole company's coworker.
Viktor lives in Slack. Top 5 on Product Hunt, 130 comments. SOC 2 certified. Your data never trains models.
"Not only have we caught up on several months of work, we are automating manual tasks and expanding our operations to things previously not possible at scale." - Jesse Guarino, Director, Torque King 4x4
Upside Barrier: 75 Must Break
Before even addressing downside scenarios, it’s important to recognize the 75 level as key resistance.
For bulls to regain control, SLV must:
Reclaim and hold above 75
Show impulsive strength with higher highs and higher lows
Demonstrate that demand is returning
Without that breakout, any short-term rallies are likely to be viewed as corrective bounces rather than trend reversals.
In other words, failure to clear 75 keeps the pressure on the downside.
Downside Scenario: Full C Wave to 47–50
If SLV breaks below 60, the structure opens the door to a full C wave decline, targeting the 47–50 range.
This projection aligns with typical Elliott Wave behavior, where:
Wave C often mirrors or extends beyond Wave A
Corrections deepen when prior support fails
Momentum accelerates as stops are triggered below key levels
The 47–50 zone also represents a logical technical target based on prior consolidation areas and Fibonacci relationships within the broader structure.
This would not necessarily mark a long-term bearish trend—but it would confirm that the correction is significantly larger and more complex than initially expected.
Tired of news that feels like noise?
Every day, 4.5 million readers turn to 1440 for their factual news fix. We sift through 100+ sources to bring you a complete summary of politics, global events, business, and culture — all in a brief 5-minute email. No spin. No slant. Just clarity.
Market Psychology Behind the Move
At this stage, the psychology of the market is shifting.
Earlier in the correction:
Bulls expected a quick recovery after the zigzag
Buyers stepped in on dips, anticipating continuation
Now:
Confidence is weakening as price fails to rebound
Traders who bought the bounce are underwater
Sellers are gaining confidence near resistance
This transition phase is critical. When support levels are tested repeatedly without strong buying interest, they tend to weaken—and eventually break.
Correlation With Gold
Silver often moves in tandem with gold, and the weakness seen in GLD adds another layer of concern.
If gold continues to struggle near its own key support levels, it increases the probability that silver will follow suit. Historically, silver tends to exhibit higher volatility, meaning that if gold breaks down, silver often experiences larger percentage declines.
This intermarket relationship reinforces the importance of the current levels in SLV.
What to Watch Closely
To navigate this setup, traders should focus on a few key signals:
Reaction at 60: Strong bounce vs. weak consolidation
Behavior near 75: Rejection vs. breakout
Volume trends: Rising selling pressure on declines
Structure of moves: Impulsive drops vs. choppy drift
A clean, impulsive move below 60 would strongly favor the bearish C wave scenario.
Risk vs Reward Profile
From a trading perspective, this setup presents a clear framework:
Bullish case: Reclaim 75 and build upward momentum
Bearish case: Break below 60 and target 47–50
Invalidation points: Defined on both sides
This type of structure—where key levels clearly define outcomes—can be valuable for traders looking to position around high-probability setups.
Final Take
SLV is at a crossroads.
The failed zigzag reversal has weakened the bullish case, and price is now pressing against a critical support level at 60. Without a strong move above 75, the path of least resistance appears to be shifting lower.
A confirmed breakdown below 60 would likely trigger a full C wave decline toward 47–50, completing a much deeper and more complex correction than originally anticipated.
For now, all eyes are on support. Because in markets like this, it’s not just about where price has been—it’s about how it reacts at the levels that matter most.