GLD Failed Zigzag Reversal = Potential Downside Break of 400

News doesn’t take weekends off, neither should your portfolio. What about when the S&P moves 3% during your commute?

Liquid allows anyone to trade stocks, commodities, FX, pre-IPO companies, crypto, and more with up to 100X leverage, 24/7, from your phone or computer.

Any Market - Trade everything from Gold to Bitcoin, OpenAI to Nvidia, SK Hynix to JPY.

Anywhere - Liquid is available on iOS, Android, and desktop platforms, letting you trade from the subway, your office, and maybe even the bathroom.

Any Time - Liquid markets are open 24/7; so when an unprecedented event happens on Saturday, you can stay on top of your portfolio.

Active traders qualify for rewards each month!

Start trading in minutes

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD): Critical Support Test Could Decide the Next Major Move

GLD is approaching one of the most important technical inflection points in its current Elliott Wave structure. What initially appeared to be a clean ABC zigzag correction is now becoming more complex—and potentially more dangerous—as price action drifts closer to a key support zone that could determine whether gold stabilizes or enters a deeper corrective phase.

From a structural standpoint, GLD looked poised to complete a textbook ABC zigzag decline from 520 down to 400. This type of correction is common after a strong impulsive advance and typically unfolds in three distinct waves:

In this case, the market seemed to be tracking that script well. The expectation was for a controlled descent into the 400 region, where the correction would complete, setting the stage for a renewed bullish cycle.

However, the recent price behavior has introduced a layer of uncertainty. Instead of a clean, impulsive drop into the 400 target, GLD has been drifting lower in what can best be described as a “curvy” and overlapping decline from around 450.

This matters.

In Elliott Wave terms, corrective waves should still maintain a degree of structure and clarity. When price action becomes overly choppy, overlapping, and prolonged, it often signals one of two things:

The closer GLD gets to 400, the more critical this level becomes—not just as a potential support zone, but as a line between two very different market outcomes.

Claude.ai is one thing. Claude Cowork with MCP connections, running agentic workflows, taking actions across your data with ungoverned skills? That is a different conversation entirely, and most security teams are not equipped to govern it.

Harmonic Security is built to secure everything Claude offers. Full browser controls for Claude.ai, deep governance over agentic MCP workflows, and real-time visibility into what Claude is doing across your organization. So your CISO can say yes to the tools your business is already demanding.

Get the guide: Securing Claude Cowork for the enterprise.

Help Security Say Yes

The 400 level is now the key battleground.

If GLD can hold above 400 and stabilize, the original ABC zigzag interpretation remains valid. That would suggest the correction is either complete or nearing completion, and the market could begin forming a base for the next impulsive move higher.

But if GLD breaks decisively below 400, the implications shift significantly.

The first downside target below 400 comes in around 370, which aligns with a prior Wave 4 support zone. This is a common retracement area where price often finds temporary support, as previous consolidation zones tend to act as magnets during corrections.

A move to 370 would still be considered a deeper—but not catastrophic—extension of the correction. It would suggest that the zigzag either extended or morphed into a more complex structure, such as a double zigzag.

The more concerning scenario emerges if the breakdown below 400 accelerates and fails to find support at 370.

In that case, GLD could be entering a larger degree Wave 3 to the downside, with potential targets in the 250–275 range.

This would represent a significant structural shift—from a corrective pullback to a full bearish impulse.

However, it’s important to emphasize that this outcome, while technically possible, currently appears less likely. The projected move is extremely deep relative to the preceding structure, and such a decline would likely require a major shift in macro conditions, such as sharply rising real yields or a strong U.S. dollar surge.

500+ speakers. 18 content tracks. Workshops, masterclasses, and the people actually shipping the tools you use every day. WeAreDevelopers World Congress — September 23–25. Use code GITPUSH26 for 10% off.

Secure Your Pass

The real risk lies in what Elliott Wave practitioners call a “failed zigzag.”

If GLD was indeed attempting to complete an ABC correction into 400 but fails to hold that level, it signals that the market did not find equilibrium where it was expected to. That failure can trigger a cascading effect:

This is how relatively controlled corrections can evolve into much sharper declines.

At this point in the structure, sentiment is likely mixed:

This type of indecision often precedes a decisive move. The longer price hovers near support without a strong bounce, the more vulnerable that level becomes.

To navigate this setup effectively, traders should focus on a few key signals:

GLD is at a pivotal moment.

The expectation of a completed ABC zigzag from 520 to 400 is now being tested by a slow, overlapping decline that suggests the correction may not be finished. The 400 level stands as the critical line between stabilization and potential acceleration to the downside.

A successful hold could mark the end of the correction and the beginning of a new bullish phase. But a confirmed breakdown opens the door to 370 initially, and in a more extreme scenario, a much deeper move toward 250–275.

The structure is no longer straightforward—and that’s exactly why this level matters so much.