In our new white paper, The Architecture Behind AI-Native Revenue Automation, Tabs CTO Deepak Bapat breaks down what it actually takes to apply AI to revenue workflows without breaking the books.

You’ll learn why probabilistic reasoning isn’t enough for finance, how Tabs pairs LLMs with deterministic logic, and why a unified Commercial Graph is the foundation for scalable, audit-ready automation. From contract interpretation to cash application, this paper goes deep on where AI belongs—and where it absolutely doesn’t.

If you’re evaluating AI for billing, collections, or revenue operations, this is the architecture perspective most vendors won’t show you.

Get the whitepaper

After a relentless rally driven by artificial intelligence enthusiasm, semiconductor leadership, and aggressive momentum buying across mega-cap technology stocks, QQQ is finally beginning to experience a more meaningful corrective phase.

The ETF had been one of the strongest-performing vehicles in the market as traders aggressively rotated into growth and AI-related names. But after such an extended upside run, momentum is beginning to cool, and the current structure now appears consistent with a classic Elliott Wave zigzag correction.

The current wave structure shows:

At this stage, the pullback still appears more corrective than bearish overall, but the increasing volatility suggests the market is moving into a temporary reset phase after weeks of nearly uninterrupted upside momentum.

One of the defining characteristics of recent market action was the sheer strength of technology leadership.

Mega-cap names and semiconductor stocks had been moving aggressively higher as:

QQQ became one of the clearest representations of that momentum environment because of its concentration in high-growth technology companies.

But eventually, every strong trend reaches a point where:

That appears to be exactly what is developing now.

Importantly, this type of corrective behavior is normal after extended rallies and does not automatically imply the long-term bullish trend is broken.

From an Elliott Wave perspective, the current pullback appears to be unfolding as a zigzag correction.

A zigzag generally consists of:

These corrections are typically sharper and more directional than sideways consolidations because they occur after strong impulsive advances where momentum becomes temporarily exhausted.

In QQQ, the initial A wave decline moved from approximately 701 down to 692.

701-692=9

That represents a 9-point initial decline, which now becomes the basis for projecting the developing C wave targets.

The importance of the first decline is psychological as much as technical. It marks the first meaningful interruption in bullish momentum after an extended upside phase.

According to the current zigzag projection, the first major downside target comes in near 688, based on the standard A = C relationship.

Wave\ A=Wave\ C\rightarrow Target=688

In Elliott Wave analysis, equality between Wave A and Wave C is one of the most common corrective structures.

This setup implies:

Psychologically, this structure often creates confusion because traders interpret the Wave B bounce as evidence that the correction is already over.

However, Wave C frequently develops afterward and creates the final downside leg before the market fully stabilizes.

The 688 level therefore becomes an important support zone where:

Because QQQ tracks many of the market’s most influential technology stocks, reactions at this level could significantly impact broader market sentiment.

If downside momentum accelerates further, the next major Fibonacci projection comes in near 683, based on the 1.618 extension of Wave A.

Wave\ C=1.618\times Wave\ A\rightarrow Target=683

Extended C waves often occur when:

Because QQQ is heavily concentrated in growth stocks and semiconductor leadership, even a moderate cooling in technology sentiment can create sharper corrective movement.

A move toward 683 would still fit within a normal corrective structure and would not necessarily damage the broader long-term trend.

In fact, stronger corrections often help:

Another important factor behind the current correction is the recent cooling across semiconductor leadership.

Several high-flying chip stocks that had been driving market momentum higher are now beginning to show:

Because semiconductors were among the strongest market leaders during the rally, any pause in that group naturally impacts QQQ heavily.

That sector-wide cooling appears to be contributing to the current zigzag structure.

One of the most misunderstood aspects of market structure is that corrections are often necessary for sustaining bullish trends.

Without pullbacks:

Healthy corrections help:

The current zigzag in QQQ still appears more consistent with a healthy reset than a major trend reversal.

The current structure highlights two important downside areas:

These levels now become critical battlegrounds between buyers and sellers.

How price reacts around these zones will likely determine whether:

QQQ is currently undergoing a classic Elliott Wave zigzag correction after an extended technology-driven rally.

The initial A wave decline from 701 to 692 established the corrective structure, with current projections pointing toward:

While short-term volatility may continue increasing, the broader structure still appears corrective rather than bearish overall.

For traders, environments like this often reward patience more than aggression — allowing the market to complete its reset before the next major directional move develops.